WorkplacePsychology Blogging Tips

Photo: Blogging Research Wordle

I created this list several years ago and have shared it with a few people. While I don’t think they really cared for it, I truly believe in its importance. If you are someone who is considering starting a blog or are a blog newbie, this post is for you. The advice I’m sharing here comes from my own experience setting up and running the WorkplacePsychology.Net blog as well as several other previous blogs. While I am certainly no blogging expert, I do know a thing or two, and want to pass the knowledge I’ve gained on to others.

Here’s my advice about blogging:

1) Time Commitment: Blogging takes a considerable amount of time, creativity, and energy. Have a clear understanding of what you want to write about and why you think it is relevant. Keep your content fresh so it’s important to post regularly. When you’re first starting out and are building readership, you’ll need to post 2-3 times a week. Once you build your “brand” (i.e. your name/reputation) then it’s ok to post less frequently.

2) Target Audience: Know who or what kind of person you want reading your blog. If you want business people reading your blog then the topics and tone of your blog should be about business or a particular business topic. If you want people interested in cooking then the topics and tone of your blog would cater to cooking.

For instance, on my WorkplacePsychology.Net blog, I focus on several key topics (Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Occupational Health Psychology, and Organizational Behavior) and only those topics. My audience are industrial-organizational psychology, occupational health psychology, organizational behavior, human resources, and business and management professionals. Thus, my content is targeted at that demographic only. By being everything to everybody, you lose focus and will turn people off.

3) Free vs. Paid Hosting

FREE:

Advantage: If you want to save money, I recommend that you use, WordPress.com. It’s free and there are many templates available to you. The learning curve isn’t too steep and there’s much more flexibility down the line if and when you want to do more with your site. You go to WordPress.com, create a blog name, and within minutes you are online with your very own blog!

The two biggest advantages to going the free route are that (1) you don’t have to worry about maintaining it (on the back-end side) and guarding your blog from people trying to hack in, (2) it’s free or the upgrades available are much more affordable (premium themes, options, etc.).

Disadvantage: While you can tweak a pre-existing theme somewhat, you can’t design your site (i.e., your theme) from scratch and you are limited to the themes available to you.

PAID:

Advantage: You’ll have total control over how your blog/website will look.

Disadvantage: However, when starting out, I do not recommend the paid hosting route for anyone new to blogging. First, the cost involved is much greater. Second, it is much more complicated to set up your own domain (yourname.com), install or set up the CMS (content management system) like WordPress, and maintain it on your own. Third, and most importantly, it is VERY easy to mess up your blog if you do not know what you are doing (e.g., html, ftp, etc.).

4) SEO (Search Engine Optimization): A good blog will use keywords and be search engine-friendly. So when people look up topics (they type in business consultant) your name will come up in Google searches “higher” than someone who didn’t optimize his/her site. WordPress.Com does a nice job helping you optimize your blog if you continue to use a set of keywords or tags.

5) Blog Name: Pick a name that’s easy to remember and that ends in either .Com or .Net. If possible, keep it short but if it’s easy to say then it’s fine that it’s a little long. In general, I recommend a short, easy to remember blog name. Avoid using a dash (-) or underscore (_).

Here’s what I did for my own blog. For WorkplacePsychology.Net, I’m using the free WordPress.Com’s service. That means I don’t pay anything to have my blog “hosted” on the Internet (it’s where your blog lives online). But WordPress.Com forces me to have a domain name like this: “workplacepsychology.wordpress.com”

As you can see that’s too long for anyone to remember. So, I bought the domain upgrade which replaces my site’s default address with a custom domain of my choice. Instead of https://workplacepsychology.wordpress.com/, this upgrade makes my site available at http://workplacepsychology.net/.

6) Layout: Make sure your blog is user-friendly and easy to navigate. Font size should be large enough so people don’t squint reading it. There should not be “clutter.” On my blog, I paid for a premium theme and added some information unique to my site on the right sidebar. Some blogs are littered with ads, flashing signs, and stuff everywhere. Those are big no-nos. Pick a design (theme) that is easy on the eyes, with legible font size.

7) Academic & Scholarly: This last and final tip applies to bloggers who want to write a scholarly/academic blog. A key differentiator about my WorkplacePsychology.Net blog is the scholarly content and crediting of sources, but one that’s presented in an easy-to-digest manner. My inspiration for this comes from the “The Idea in Brief” (a short, bite-sized summary of an article) that the Harvard Business Review uses in its magazine and website. Naturally, each person’s blog and writing style is different and what works for me might not work for you. That said, if you plan on providing academic content on your blog, my advice is to keep it short and simple. Experience has taught me that no one wants to read or listen to academic jargon. Perhaps one of the funniest stories about academic-speak comes from a conference I attended in which one professor attempted to explain a concept he was unfamiliar with. However, instead of being upfront and telling the audience that he had limited knowledge and giving a short summary, he went on and on, further confusing the audience and himself in the process. Those of us who actually knew the material (I was one) could not help but laughed. Finally, to put the poor guy out of his misery, a charismatic and wise professor (he’s also a retired Army Colonel) stood up, interrupted him, and asked this beautifully rhetorical question: “Do people really talk like that?” The entire room erupted in laughter! He said what we were all thinking but couldn’t say. It boils down to this: Keeping it simple has nothing to do with “dumbing down” the material, but everything to do with understanding it well enough to simplify it for others to grasp. That takes a great deal of effort.

“If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” – Albert Einstein

About these ads

Why I Started the WorkplacePsychology blog

Photo: Inspirational Quotes – Happy Purpose

The irony about working hard to create my very own blog and watching it become recognized online (i.e., my blog ranks high on Google search) is that I get many requests from people who want to do guest posts. It’s got me thinking back to why I started this blog. The more I thought about it, the more I felt the need to share my thoughts with the readers and visitors of WorkplacePsychology.Net.

Although this blog is not a business (e.g., there’s no revenue stream), I do consider myself the sole proprietor (i.e. it’s owned and managed by one person). Being in the driver seat gives me complete control over this blog, but it also means I have total responsibility for it.

The main reason why I do not accept guest posts:

As the sole creator and author of the WorkplacePsychology.Net blog, I want to ensure that what is written comes directly from me. This is because WorkplacePsychology.Net is written through a scholarly lens (that’s why there are citations in almost every post). I often spend days researching and writing just one post. Why? The reason is simple. In order to keep my promise of a blog that’s scholarly but written in a “clear, concise, and easy-to-understand manner” I have to wade through textbooks, psychology journals, and/or sites such as the New York Times, Forbes, the Harvard Business Review or the Wall Street Journal to gather information. Next, I have to make sense of the information and communicate it to my readers in an informative and engaging manner.

Because of the time-intensive nature of what goes into each post, I do not post as frequently as many other bloggers. I am a firm believer in quality over quantity. In my humble opinion, it is more important to me that there is one high quality, well-researched post than five or ten shorter and not as substantive posts in a month.

Prior to starting WorkplacePsychology.Net, I sat down and mapped out my purpose for writing the blog and who I wanted my target audience to be. I then looked at the gap (i.e., where I felt I could contribute), which was very wide. On one end of the continuum were blogs written with absolutely no citations or crediting of sources. In my opinion, this is not only careless but irresponsible writing. On the other end were blogs attached to psychology associations. More often than not, these are not only boring to read, but because the designs were poor, they were also difficult to read because the font size was too small.

So that’s where this WorkplacePsychology blog sits. Of course, it would not make any sense if I discussed not accepting guest posts, without talking about my goals for starting this blog.

My two reasons for starting this WorkplacePsychology blog are as follows: (1) I want people to read, understand, and be excited about how psychology applies to the workplace, and (2) I want the blog to be a reputable and trusted resource for people to turn to.

I am very lucky because both of these goals have come to fruition. This, I truly believe, would not have been possible had I not crafted and labored over every post. Granted, there are posts that I am really proud of and there are some that are not as substantial as I would have liked.

To those who have contacted me asking about guest posting, thank you for your interest in contributing. I hope this post explains why I do not accept guest posters. This might change someday down the road, and when that day comes, I’ll be sure to let everyone know. But, as it stands, this WorkplacePsychology blog shall remain a “one-man band.” Thanks for your understanding.

Kind regards,

Steve

Economic Mobility and the American Dream

This video is from The Pew Charitable Trusts’ Economic Mobility Project which focuses public attention on the ability to move up or down the economic ladder within a lifetime or from one generation to the next.

The video shows the difference between two measurements of economic mobility. It’s important to note that there are two ways of measuring economic mobility: absolute and relative. As the video states, each offers an understanding of the health and status of the American Dream; however, neither measure should be taken in isolation for a complete picture of economic mobility in our country.

The example of being on the escalator (starting at the 1:58 mark to the 2:30 mark) is a great visual aid. As the Pew explains:

“For more than two centuries, economic opportunity and upward mobility have formed the foundation of the American Dream, and they remain at the core of our nation’s identity. As policy makers seek to foster equality of opportunity, it’s critical that their decisions be informed by a robust and nonpartisan fact base on economic mobility.”

In addition to this eye-catching video, one might also observe that economic mobility is linked to our salaries or compensations for the work we do. Interestingly,

“Many experts now believe that money is a much more important motivator than was previously believed, more because of its inherent or symbolic value than because of what it can buy. . . . One recent study found that people who are more highly paid have higher job performance because the higher paycheck makes them feel more valued in the organization (i.e., they have a more positive self-concept)” (McShane & Von Glinow, 2010, p. 167).

References

McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2010). Organizational behavior: Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

The Pew Charitable Trusts’ Economic Mobility Project. http://www.pewstates.org/projects/economic-mobility-project-328061

Cognitive Dissonance When Firing Family or Friend

Photo: Conflicts

I was contacted by a career advice reporter with FINS.com, the jobs and career website of The Wall Street Journal, for my thoughts for an article about why workers struggle when they have to fire someone with whom they have a close personal relationship. While I’m glad to see my name mentioned, I feel that much of what I shared with her was left out of the article. Two things did manage to make the cut – cognitive dissonance and the mention of the Parker and McKinley (2008) article. However, without offering more details, I’m afraid that readers of that article might miss my message.

Here is what I emailed her:

We spend a great deal of time working alongside others at work. In fact, if you consider that the typical worker spends 8 hours a day at work, it means that many of us spend more face-time with our colleagues than with our own families.

A more specific explanation of why workers struggle when they have to fire someone with whom they have a close personal relationship is something called cognitive dissonance. It’s a state of tension, which we want to avoid, that occurs when we perceive an inconsistency between our beliefs, feelings, and behavior.

So, if we spend a great deal of time with someone and have developed a close relationship with that person, then it is understandable that having to turn around and fire that individual would create conflicts or tensions between what we are required to do (i.e. the act of firing someone) and our feelings (i.e., that person I must fire is a friend or someone I care about).

Parker and McKinley (2008) wrote about how employees who assist in the implementation of layoffs at their organization (i.e., they help the company lay off other employees) experience cognitive dissonance. They maintained that the longer you spend with the employee being terminated, the greater the odds of you experiencing cognitive dissonance when you need to let that employee go.

Parker and McKinley (2008) said in order to help reduce cognitive dissonance, the one terminating (the agent) might subscribe to an ideology of shareholder interest (the belief that shareholder value should be the main criterion for management decision-making). If the layoff agent is a strong believer in this ideology of shareholder interest, he or she would regard the increase of shareholder wealth as the first priority of management and thus back or defend actions that enhance shareholder wealth.

Basically, according to cognitive dissonance theory and the article by Parker and McKinley, the person who must fire a coworker can change the way he or she thinks about firing or letting someone go and rationalize that while the layoff or termination of a coworker might harm that individual employee, it would have positive consequences for the overall organization.

Reference

Parker, T., & McKinley, W. (2008). Layoff agency: A theoretical framework. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(1), 46-58. doi:10.1177/1548051808318001

Citation to FINS article:

Eggers, K. (2012, June 29). How to fire your dad. FINS Finance – Career Advice. Retrieved from http://www.fins.com/Finance/Articles/SBB0001424052702303649504577493183038820606/How-to-Fire-Your-Dad